Skip to content
Igor D.

02 · Universidad Europea · UniCorn AI guidance

A new way to learn with AI

Humanising higher education discovery through conversational intelligence.

Client
Universidad Europea
Role
Creative Director, Brand and UX/UI Lead
Industry
Higher education
Impact
  • +42% application completions
  • −65% discovery bounce rate
  • 4.8/5 student rating
Year
2025
UniCorn, an assistant that opens with options rather than an empty box.

Overview

Choosing a university, without the maze

UniCorn is an AI guidance platform for Universidad Europea that replaces dense course catalogues and complex site hierarchies with a conversational mobile assistant, guiding students from initial programme discovery to a confident application.

Prototype

Try the conversation

The working prototype, in Spanish. Open it in Figma if the embed does not load.

Problem

Information friction at the point of greatest intent

Traditional discovery friction

University website

Deep menus and jargon

Overloaded subpages, PDF catalogues and forms written for the institution, not the applicant.

Blank canvas stress

An open text box with no context leaves someone unsure what they are even allowed to ask.

Drop off and abandonment

Cognitive load peaks at exactly the point someone was ready to apply.

The design challenge

  1. Structuring an unstructured conversation

    AI assistants often fail because an open prompt creates blank canvas paralysis. The experience needed clear pathways while still feeling like a conversation rather than a form.

  2. Conversation and rich interface together

    Replies made only of text produce chat fatigue fast. The system needed real interface components, degree cards, location pickers, deadline counters, sitting inside the conversation itself.

  3. An inclusive system by default

    Educational tools have to meet WCAG properly: contrast that holds, touch targets that work, and typography that stays legible across whatever phone a student happens to own.

Strategy

Mapping intent before writing a single reply

To make the conversation feel natural I mapped intent pathways across the discovery milestones, so the assistant could move from an exploratory question to a decision making tool without the student noticing the gear change.

UniCorn intent map

UniCorn assistant

Explore and profile

  • Interactive chips
  • Interest profiling
  • Persona routing

Match and compare

  • Degree comparison
  • Tuition and schedules
  • Career outcomes

Apply and get support

  • Requirement checklist
  • Campus tour booking
  • Direct advisor handoff

Explorations

Three decisions, and what each one cost

Exploration 01

Open text against guided branching

Constraint
Open ended language interfaces hit dead ends on vague prompts like “tell me about design”.
Trade off
Rigid decision trees turn the assistant into a clunky phone menu.
Solution
A hybrid model using quick reply chips for degrees, tuition, and campus life while keeping the open text field accessible.

Exploration 02

Long replies against components inside the chat

Constraint
Full degree descriptions in chat bubbles create unreadable walls of text.
Trade off
Modals interrupt conversation flow and disconnect users from the thread.
Solution
Embedded action cards delivering compact interactive details (duration, language, key modules, compare option) that keep the chat scannable.

Exploration 03

Tone, identity and staying legible

Constraint
Assistants can feel robotic or too playful for major career and financial decisions.
Trade off
Standard university branding is formal and unoptimised for mobile chat.
Solution
A custom design system featuring a friendly geometric mark, energetic palette, high contrast typography, and strict accessibility standards (48px touch targets, AA or AAA contrast).

System

A conversational design system, not a screen set

The same components had to survive low fidelity exploration, an interactive prototype and engineering handoff without being redrawn at each stage.

UniCorn design system

Foundational tokens

  • Vibrant palette that still passes AA
  • Typography tuned for small screens
  • Touch target and spacing grid

Conversational components

  • User and bot bubbles
  • Quick reply chips
  • Live typing states
  • System notifications

Rich module cards

  • Academic programme cards
  • Campus location pickers
  • Requirement trackers
  • Application drawers
Indigo 600 as the primary, with a full tonal scale beneath it.
Every pairing checked rather than assumed. The weakest still clears AA.
Every button, every size, every state, specified once.

Deliverables

Four pieces, end to end

Deliverable 01

Conversational onboarding and intent profiling

Opens with low friction interest cards rather than an empty prompt, tuning what the assistant knows to the student's degree level and subject before the first real question is asked.

The five core screens, with the layout grid they were built on.

Deliverable 02

Prototype and interaction states

A full set of mobile viewports covering typing indicators, message grouping, inline cards and progressive disclosure, built to keep the thread free of clutter as it grows.

The conversational parts on their own, before they meet a screen.

Deliverable 03

Visual identity and accessible palette

A brand built around the UniCorn mark, with a colour architecture chosen for legibility across whatever screen and lighting a student happens to be using.

The mark, stacked and horizontal, on light and on indigo.

Deliverable 04

Flow architecture and handoff

Architectural maps documenting intent triggers, fallback states, quick reply paths and responsive component behaviour, so engineering had the whole picture rather than a set of screens.

Main path, loops and escape hatches, with the legend that makes it readable.

Reflection

What I would carry into the next one

  1. 01

    Conversational UX is information architecture in disguise

    A good assistant is not built on prompts alone. Structuring the underlying content into scannable cards and guided paths is what turns a chatbot into something that actually guides.

  2. 02

    Micro interactions are how trust gets built

    Small details, a realistic typing delay, a visible processing state, an explicit confirmation step, set honest expectations about what the assistant can and cannot do.

  3. 03

    Accessibility is not optional in education

    Contrast that holds, generous touch targets and a clear hierarchy for screen readers meant the platform served every prospective student, whatever their ability or device.